↓ Skip to main content

Advanced Technologies Demonstrated by the Miniature Integrated Camera and Spectrometer (MICAS) Aboard Deep Space 1

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advanced Technologies Demonstrated by the Miniature Integrated Camera and Spectrometer (MICAS) Aboard Deep Space 1
Published in
Space Science Reviews, May 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11214-007-9155-9
Authors

David H. Rodgers, Patricia M. Beauchamp, Laurence A. Soderblom, Robert H. Brown, Gun-Shing Chen, Meemong Lee, Bill R. Sandel, David A. Thomas, Robert T. Benoit, Roger V. Yelle

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 50%
Chemistry 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#468
of 1,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,359
of 72,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them