↓ Skip to main content

Growth and collapse of Hawaiian volcanoes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Growth and collapse of Hawaiian volcanoes
Published in
Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research, March 2006
DOI 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2005.07.022
Authors

Michelle Coombs, Barry Eakins, Peter Cervelli

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 21%
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 84%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research
#753
of 2,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,865
of 92,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.