You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comment on "Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance"
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, September 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.1129547 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Nathaniel Holland, Toshinori Okuyama, Donald L. DeAngelis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 8 | 7% |
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Austria | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 90 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 21% |
| Unknown | 7 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 60% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 20% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2023.
All research outputs
#16,620,346
of 24,453,338 outputs
Outputs from Science
#68,640
of 79,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,795
of 70,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#295
of 313 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,453,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79,778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 313 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.