↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for preferential flow through sandstone aquifers in Southern Wisconsin

Overview of attention for article published in Sedimentary Geology, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence for preferential flow through sandstone aquifers in Southern Wisconsin
Published in
Sedimentary Geology, February 2006
DOI 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2005.11.008
Authors

Susan K. Swanson, Jean M. Bahr, Kenneth R. Bradbury, Kristin M. Anderson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 26%
Researcher 5 12%
Other 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 42%
Environmental Science 6 14%
Engineering 4 9%
Unspecified 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Sedimentary Geology
#213
of 865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,397
of 170,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sedimentary Geology
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 865 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.