You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Testing the Junk-food Hypothesis on Marine Birds: Effects of Prey Type on Growth and Development
|
---|---|
Published in |
Waterbirds, December 2006
|
DOI | 10.1675/1524-4695(2006)29[407:ttjhom]2.0.co;2 |
Authors |
Marc D. Romano, John F. Piatt, Daniel D. Roby |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 2 | 2% |
United States | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 111 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 28% |
Student > Master | 26 | 22% |
Researcher | 21 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Unknown | 16 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 57% |
Environmental Science | 22 | 18% |
Materials Science | 2 | 2% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 21 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2009.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Waterbirds
#185
of 626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,632
of 156,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Waterbirds
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 626 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.