You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neural network prediction of carbonate lithofacies from well logs, Big Bow and Sand Arroyo Creek fields, Southwest Kansas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Computers & Geosciences, August 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cageo.2005.10.020 |
| Authors |
Lianshuang Qi, Timothy R. Carr |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 26 | 36% |
| Engineering | 9 | 13% |
| Energy | 4 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Computers & Geosciences
#286
of 970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,665
of 90,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computers & Geosciences
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 970 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them