You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relative vulnerability of female turtles to road mortality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Conservation, April 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00032.x |
| Authors |
D. A. Steen, M. J. Aresco, S. G. Beilke, B. W. Compton, E. P. Condon, C. Kenneth Dodd, H. Forrester, J. W. Gibbons, J. L. Greene, G. Johnson, T. A. Langen, M. J. Oldham, D. N. Oxier, R. A. Saumure, F. W. Schueler, J. M. Sleeman, L. L. Smith, J. K. Tucker, J. P. Gibbs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 56% |
| India | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 394 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 375 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 97 | 25% |
| Researcher | 63 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 10% |
| Other | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 12% |
| Unknown | 64 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 179 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 75 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 6% |
| Unknown | 72 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,526,782
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Animal Conservation
#693
of 1,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,332
of 84,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Conservation
#54
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.