↓ Skip to main content

Implementing a U.S. National Phenology Network

Overview of attention for article published in Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementing a U.S. National Phenology Network
Published in
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, June 2011
DOI 10.1029/2005eo510005
Authors

Julio L. Betancourt, Mark D. Schwartz, David D. Breshears, Daniel R. Cayan, Michael D. Dettinger, David W. Inouye, Eric Post, Bradley C. Reed

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 10%
Unknown 43 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 17%
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 13 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union
#2,196
of 3,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,221
of 122,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union
#100
of 624 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 624 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.