You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In-depth virological and immunological characterization of HIV-1 cure after CCR5Δ32/Δ32 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41591-023-02213-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Björn-Erik Ole Jensen, Elena Knops, Leon Cords, Nadine Lübke, Maria Salgado, Kathleen Busman-Sahay, Jacob D. Estes, Laura E. P. Huyveneers, Federico Perdomo-Celis, Melanie Wittner, Cristina Gálvez, Christiane Mummert, Caroline Passaes, Johanna M. Eberhard, Carsten Münk, Ilona Hauber, Joachim Hauber, Eva Heger, Jozefien De Clercq, Linos Vandekerckhove, Silke Bergmann, Gábor A. Dunay, Florian Klein, Dieter Häussinger, Johannes C. Fischer, Kathrin Nachtkamp, Joerg Timm, Rolf Kaiser, Thomas Harrer, Tom Luedde, Monique Nijhuis, Asier Sáez-Cirión, Julian Schulze zur Wiesch, Annemarie M. J. Wensing, Javier Martinez-Picado, Guido Kobbe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 616 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 50 | 8% |
| France | 44 | 7% |
| Spain | 40 | 6% |
| Germany | 27 | 4% |
| Mexico | 15 | 2% |
| Japan | 14 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 12 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 2% |
| Italy | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 92 | 15% |
| Unknown | 302 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 522 | 85% |
| Scientists | 59 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 45 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 19 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 49 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2570. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,975
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#54
of 9,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88
of 430,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#3
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 103.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.