You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ferric iron in sediments as a novel CO2 mineral trap: CO2–SO2 reaction with hematite
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Geochemistry, November 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2005.06.005 |
| Authors |
James L. Palandri, Robert J. Rosenbauer, Yousif K. Kharaka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 34% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 31 | 48% |
| Engineering | 7 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Applied Geochemistry
#252
of 961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,896
of 76,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Geochemistry
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 961 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them