↓ Skip to main content

Hawaiian submarine manganese-iron oxide crusts—A dating tool?

Overview of attention for article published in Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hawaiian submarine manganese-iron oxide crusts—A dating tool?
Published in
Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 2004
DOI 10.1130/b25304.1
Authors

James G. Moore, David A. Clague

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Master 7 16%
Other 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 60%
Environmental Science 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Geological Society of America Bulletin
#1,163
of 2,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,568
of 143,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geological Society of America Bulletin
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.