You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of remdesivir in patients hospitalised with COVID-19: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00528-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alain Amstutz, Benjamin Speich, France Mentré, Corina Silvia Rueegg, Drifa Belhadi, Lambert Assoumou, Charles Burdet, Srinivas Murthy, Lori Elizabeth Dodd, Yeming Wang, Kari A O Tikkinen, Florence Ader, Maya Hites, Maude Bouscambert, Mary Anne Trabaud, Mike Fralick, Todd C Lee, Ruxandra Pinto, Andreas Barratt-Due, Fridtjof Lund-Johansen, Fredrik Müller, Olli P O Nevalainen, Bin Cao, Tyler Bonnett, Alexandra Griessbach, Ala Taji Heravi, Christof Schönenberger, Perrine Janiaud, Laura Werlen, Soheila Aghlmandi, Stefan Schandelmaier, Yazdan Yazdanpanah, Dominique Costagliola, Inge Christoffer Olsen, Matthias Briel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 244 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 19 | 8% |
| United States | 15 | 6% |
| France | 14 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 9 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 3% |
| Finland | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| India | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 149 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 202 | 83% |
| Scientists | 24 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 540. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#46,348
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#96
of 2,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,327
of 428,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#3
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 78.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.