You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Exploitation of Pocket Gophers and Their Food Caches by Grizzly Bears
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Mammalogy, August 2004
|
DOI | 10.1644/bjk-125 |
Authors |
David J. Mattson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 4 | 3% |
India | 3 | 2% |
Czechia | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 113 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 33 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 18% |
Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
Other | 11 | 8% |
Other | 18 | 14% |
Unknown | 13 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 78 | 60% |
Environmental Science | 32 | 25% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | <1% |
Social Sciences | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 15 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammalogy
#703
of 3,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,359
of 55,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammalogy
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.