↓ Skip to main content

A novel mechanism for fine-tuning open-state stability in a voltage-gated potassium channel

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A novel mechanism for fine-tuning open-state stability in a voltage-gated potassium channel
Published in
Nature Communications, April 2013
DOI 10.1038/ncomms2761
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Voltage-gated potassium channels elicit membrane hyperpolarization through voltage-sensor domains that regulate the conductive status of the pore domain. To better understand the inherent basis for the open-closed equilibrium in these channels, we undertook an atomistic scan using synthetic fluorinated derivatives of aromatic residues previously implicated in the gating of Shaker potassium channels. Here we show that stepwise dispersion of the negative electrostatic surface potential of only one site, Phe481, stabilizes the channel open state. Furthermore, these data suggest that this apparent stabilization is the consequence of the amelioration of an inherently repulsive open-state interaction between the partial negative charge on the face of Phe481 and a highly co-evolved acidic side chain, Glu395, and this interaction is potentially modulated through the Tyr485 hydroxyl. We propose that the intrinsic open-state destabilization via aromatic repulsion represents a new mechanism by which ion channels, and likely other proteins, fine-tune conformational equilibria.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
Unknown 50 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Master 9 17%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 17%
Chemistry 6 11%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 6 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2026.
All research outputs
#10,868,011
of 31,718,789 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#59,478
of 76,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,531
of 225,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#256
of 339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,718,789 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.