You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
APPLICATION OF ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA IN SELECTING MARINE RESERVES AND DEVELOPING RESERVE NETWORKS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, February 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0215:aoecis]2.0.co;2 |
| Authors |
Callum M. Roberts, George Branch, Rodrigo H. Bustamante, Juan Carlos Castilla, Jenifer Dugan, Benjamin S. Halpern, Kevin D. Lafferty, Heather Leslie, Jane Lubchenco, Deborah McArdle, Mary Ruckelshaus, Robert R. Warner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 697 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 2% |
| Brazil | 12 | 2% |
| Portugal | 9 | 1% |
| Spain | 6 | <1% |
| Australia | 4 | <1% |
| Chile | 4 | <1% |
| Mexico | 4 | <1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| Argentina | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 21 | 3% |
| Unknown | 616 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 184 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 127 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 117 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 42 | 6% |
| Other | 128 | 18% |
| Unknown | 52 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 340 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 221 | 32% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 24 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 20 | 3% |
| Unknown | 71 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2021.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#2,029
of 3,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,700
of 144,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.