↓ Skip to main content

Pathogenic Human Viruses in Coastal Waters

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Microbiology Reviews, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
patent
8 patents

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathogenic Human Viruses in Coastal Waters
Published in
Clinical Microbiology Reviews, January 2003
DOI 10.1128/cmr.16.1.129-143.2003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dale W. Griffin, Kim A. Donaldson, John H. Paul, Joan B. Rose

Abstract

This review addresses both historical and recent investigations into viral contamination of marine waters. With the relatively recent emergence of molecular biology-based assays, a number of investigations have shown that pathogenic viruses are prevalent in marine waters being impacted by sewage. Research has shown that this group of fecal-oral viral pathogens (enteroviruses, hepatitis A viruses, Norwalk viruses, reoviruses, adenoviruses, rotaviruses, etc.) can cause a broad range of asymptomatic to severe gastrointestinal, respiratory, and eye, nose, ear, and skin infections in people exposed through recreational use of the water. The viruses and the nucleic acid signature survive for an extended period in the marine environment. One of the primary concerns of public health officials is the relationship between the presence of pathogens and the recreational risk to human health in polluted marine environments. While a number of studies have attempted to address this issue, the relationship is still poorly understood. A contributing factor to our lack of progress in the field has been the lack of sensitive methods to detect the broad range of both bacterial and viral pathogens. The application of new and advanced molecular methods will continue to contribute to our current state of knowledge in this emerging and important field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Brazil 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 277 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 25%
Researcher 45 15%
Student > Master 37 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 44 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 99 34%
Environmental Science 43 15%
Engineering 21 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 5%
Other 43 15%
Unknown 57 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,164,263
of 25,366,663 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Microbiology Reviews
#227
of 1,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,986
of 138,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Microbiology Reviews
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,366,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.