↓ Skip to main content

The future(s) of unpaid work: How susceptible do experts from different backgrounds think the domestic sphere is to automation?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
243 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
46 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The future(s) of unpaid work: How susceptible do experts from different backgrounds think the domestic sphere is to automation?
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2023
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0281282
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vili Lehdonvirta, Lulu P. Shi, Ekaterina Hertog, Nobuko Nagase, Yuji Ohta

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 11 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 15%
Unspecified 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 11 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1796. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,742
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#65
of 224,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181
of 428,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4
of 5,644 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,644 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.