You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Oral mucosal breaks trigger anti-citrullinated bacterial and human protein antibody responses in rheumatoid arthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Translational Medicine, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1126/scitranslmed.abq8476 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R Camille Brewer, Tobias V Lanz, Caryn R Hale, Gregory D Sepich-Poore, Cameron Martino, Austin D Swafford, Thomas S Carroll, Sarah Kongpachith, Lisa K Blum, Serra E Elliott, Nathalie E Blachere, Salina Parveen, John Fak, Vicky Yao, Olga Troyanskaya, Mayu O Frank, Michelle S Bloom, Shaghayegh Jahanbani, Alejandro M Gomez, Radhika Iyer, Nitya S Ramadoss, Orr Sharpe, Sangeetha Chandrasekaran, Lindsay B Kelmenson, Qian Wang, Heidi Wong, Holly L Torres, Mark Wiesen, Dana T Graves, Kevin D Deane, V Michael Holers, Rob Knight, Robert B Darnell, William H Robinson, Dana E Orange |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 215 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 44 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 6% |
| Canada | 7 | 3% |
| Australia | 6 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Panama | 3 | 1% |
| Sweden | 3 | 1% |
| Mexico | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 106 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 161 | 75% |
| Scientists | 32 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 557. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#43,950
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Science Translational Medicine
#153
of 5,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,255
of 428,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Translational Medicine
#3
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 86.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.