↓ Skip to main content

High Plant Diversity in Eocene South America: Evidence from Patagonia

Overview of attention for article published in Science, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
236 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
392 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High Plant Diversity in Eocene South America: Evidence from Patagonia
Published in
Science, April 2003
DOI 10.1126/science.1080475
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Wilf, N. Rubén Cúneo, Kirk R. Johnson, Jason F. Hicks, Scott L. Wing, John D. Obradovich

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 392 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 17 4%
Argentina 8 2%
United States 6 2%
Chile 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Colombia 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 339 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 99 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 20%
Student > Master 41 10%
Professor 29 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 28 7%
Other 90 23%
Unknown 26 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 203 52%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 81 21%
Environmental Science 47 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Social Sciences 3 <1%
Other 13 3%
Unknown 36 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,300,341
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from Science
#35,370
of 83,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,992
of 63,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#101
of 323 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 323 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.