You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modeling the radiance of the moon for on-orbit calibration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of SPIE, November 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1117/12.506117 |
| Authors |
Thomas C. Stone, Hugh H. Kieffer, Kris J. Becker |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 50% |
| Engineering | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2022.
All research outputs
#17,348,622
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of SPIE
#13,452
of 16,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,868
of 60,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of SPIE
#87
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,520 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.