You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Predicting the Safety and Effectiveness of Inferior Vena Cava Filters (PRESERVE): Outcomes at 12 months
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, February 2023
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.12.009 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Matthew S Johnson, James B Spies, Katherine T Scott, Bernet S Kato, Xiangyu Mu, John E Rectenwald, Rodney A White, Robert J Lewandowski, Minhaj S Khaja, Darryl A Zuckerman, Thomas Casciani, David L Gillespie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 36% |
Spain | 2 | 8% |
Canada | 2 | 8% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 4% |
Pakistan | 1 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 52% |
Members of the public | 10 | 40% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 1 | 14% |
Researcher | 1 | 14% |
Other | 1 | 14% |
Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 283. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#126,912
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
#11
of 3,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,383
of 427,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
#1
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.