You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimating recharge at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, USA: comparison of methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Hydrogeology Journal, January 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10040-001-0169-1 |
| Authors |
Alan L. Flint, Lorraine E. Flint, Edward M. Kwicklis, June T. Fabryka-Martin, Gudmundur S. Bodvarsson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 21% |
| Unknown | 20 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 49 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 14% |
| Engineering | 18 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 31 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#4,724,156
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Hydrogeology Journal
#126
of 710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,265
of 123,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrogeology Journal
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.