You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lag times of bank filtration at a well field, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Hydrology, September 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0022-1694(02)00164-6 |
| Authors |
R.A Sheets, R.A Darner, B.L Whitteberry |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 19% |
| Researcher | 7 | 17% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 12 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 21% |
| Engineering | 9 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2011.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hydrology
#1,405
of 8,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,025
of 48,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hydrology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,696 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.