↓ Skip to main content

Mexican native trouts: a review of their history and current systematic and conservation status

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mexican native trouts: a review of their history and current systematic and conservation status
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, June 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1025062415188
Authors

Dean A. Hendrickson, Héctor Espinosa Pérez, Lloyd T. Findley, William Forbes, Joseph R. Tomelleri, Richard L. Mayden, Jennifer L. Nielsen, Buddy Jensen, Gorgonio Ruiz Campos, Alejandro Varela Romero, Albert van der Heiden, Faustino Camarena, Francisco J. García de León

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 5 5%
United States 3 3%
Spain 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 83 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Master 10 11%
Professor 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 61%
Environmental Science 11 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 11 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#272
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,008
of 126,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them