↓ Skip to main content

Ecological conceptual models: a framework and case study on ecosystem management for South Florida sustainability

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, July 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ecological conceptual models: a framework and case study on ecosystem management for South Florida sustainability
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, July 2001
DOI 10.1016/s0048-9697(01)00746-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

J.H Gentile, M.A Harwell, W Cropper, C.C Harwell, D DeAngelis, S Davis, J.C Ogden, D Lirman

Abstract

The Everglades and South Florida ecosystems are the focus of national and international attention because of their current degraded and threatened state. Ecological risk assessment, sustainability, and ecosystem and adaptive management principles and processes are being used nationally as a decision and policy framework for a variety of types of ecological assessments. The intent of this study is to demonstrate the application of these paradigms and principles at a regional scale. The effects-directed assessment approach used in this study consists of a retrospective, eco-epidemiological phase to determine the causes for the current conditions and a prospective predictive risk-based assessment using scenario analysis to evaluate future options. Embedded in these assessment phases is a process that begins with the identification of goals and societal preferences which are used to develop an integrated suite of risk-based and policy relevant conceptual models. Conceptual models are used to illustrate the linkages among management (societal) actions, environmental stressors, and societal/ecological effects, and provide the basis for developing and testing causal hypotheses. These models, developed for a variety of landscape units and their drivers, stressors, and endpoints, are used to formulate hypotheses to explain the current conditions. They are also used as the basis for structuring management scenarios and analyses to project the temporal and spatial magnitude of risk reduction and system recovery. Within the context of recovery, the conceptual models are used in the initial development of performance criteria for those stressors that are determined to be most important in shaping the landscape, and to guide the use of numerical models used to develop quantitative performance criteria in the scenario analysis. The results will be discussed within an ecosystem and adaptive management framework that provides the foundation for decision making.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 3 2%
Chile 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 153 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 22%
Researcher 35 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Professor 9 6%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 15 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 60 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 6%
Engineering 9 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 26 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#7,136
of 29,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,932
of 40,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.