↓ Skip to main content

On the effectiveness of compact biomedical transformers

Overview of attention for article published in Bioinformatics, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
On the effectiveness of compact biomedical transformers
Published in
Bioinformatics, February 2023
DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad103
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Language models pre-trained on biomedical corpora, such as BioBERT, have recently shown promising results on downstream biomedical tasks. Many existing pre-trained models, on the other hand, are resource-intensive and computationally heavy owing to factors such as embedding size, hidden dimension, and number of layers. The natural language processing (NLP) community has developed numerous strategies to compress these models utilising techniques such as pruning, quantisation, and knowledge distillation, resulting in models that are considerably faster, smaller, and subsequently easier to use in practice. By the same token, in this paper we introduce six lightweight models, namely, BioDistilBERT, BioTinyBERT, BioMobileBERT, DistilBioBERT, TinyBioBERT, and CompactBioBERT which are obtained either by knowledge distillation from a biomedical teacher or continual learning on the Pubmed dataset. We evaluate all of our models on three biomedical tasks and compare them with BioBERT-v1.1 to create the best efficient lightweight models that perform on par with their larger counterparts. We trained six different models in total, with the largest model having 65 million in parameters and the smallest having 15 million; a far lower range of parameters compared with BioBERT's 110M. Based on our experiments on three different biomedical tasks, we found that models distilled from a biomedical teacher and models that have been additionally pre-trained on the PubMed dataset can retain up to 98.8% and 98.6% of the performance of the BioBERT-v1.1, respectively. Overall, our best model below 30M parameters is BioMobileBERT, while our best models over 30M parameters are DistilBioBERT and CompactBioBERT, which can keep up to 98.2% and 98.8% of the performance of the BioBERT-v1.1, respectively. Codes are available at: https://github.com/nlpie-research/Compact-Biomedical-Transformers. Trained models can be accessed at: https://huggingface.co/nlpie. Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Unspecified 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 19 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 10 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 19 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2025.
All research outputs
#3,957,691
of 32,434,533 outputs
Outputs from Bioinformatics
#2,898
of 14,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,225
of 442,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioinformatics
#32
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,434,533 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.