You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimating suspended sediment and trace element fluxes in large river basins: methodological considerations as applied to the NASQAN programme
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Hydrological Processes, May 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1002/hyp.206 |
| Authors |
Arthur J. Horowitz, Kent A. Elrick, James J. Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 17% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 24 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 22% |
| Engineering | 8 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,358,936
of 25,130,202 outputs
Outputs from Hydrological Processes
#400
of 2,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,825
of 41,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrological Processes
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,130,202 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.