↓ Skip to main content

Geologic History of the Polar Regions of Mars Based on Mars Global Surveyor Data I. Noachian and Hesperian Periods

Overview of attention for article published in ICARUS, November 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geologic History of the Polar Regions of Mars Based on Mars Global Surveyor Data I. Noachian and Hesperian Periods
Published in
ICARUS, November 2001
DOI 10.1006/icar.2001.6675
Authors

Kenneth L Tanaka, Eric J Kolb

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Netherlands 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 33 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 26%
Professor 5 13%
Other 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 29 76%
Physics and Astronomy 3 8%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from ICARUS
#2,513
of 5,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,661
of 45,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ICARUS
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.