↓ Skip to main content

Nitrate flux in the Mississippi River

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
260 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nitrate flux in the Mississippi River
Published in
Nature, November 2001
DOI 10.1038/35102672
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory F. McIsaac, Mark B. David, George Z. Gertner, Donald A. Goolsby

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
Austria 2 1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 187 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 19%
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 7%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 23 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 74 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 31 16%
Engineering 11 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 32 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#70,675
of 97,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,661
of 45,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#219
of 325 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 325 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.