↓ Skip to main content

Key challenges and ways forward in researching the “good death”: qualitative in-depth interview and focus group study

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Key challenges and ways forward in researching the “good death”: qualitative in-depth interview and focus group study
Published in
British Medical Journal, February 2007
DOI 10.1136/bmj.39097.582639.55
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 4%
United States 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Unknown 155 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 22%
Student > Master 30 18%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Librarian 8 5%
Other 35 21%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 31%
Social Sciences 25 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Psychology 15 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 29 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2009.
All research outputs
#6,100,427
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#32,840
of 75,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,590
of 129,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#92
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.