↓ Skip to main content

Dust and Ice Deposition in the Martian Geologic Record

Overview of attention for article published in ICARUS, April 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dust and Ice Deposition in the Martian Geologic Record
Published in
ICARUS, April 2000
DOI 10.1006/icar.1999.6297
Authors

Kenneth L. Tanaka

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 13%
Professor 5 10%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 32 67%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2009.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from ICARUS
#2,513
of 5,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,852
of 40,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ICARUS
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.