↓ Skip to main content

Delimitation of the Extended Continental Shelf in Somalia v. Kenya in the ICJ: A Critique

Overview of attention for article published in Chinese Journal of International Law, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Delimitation of the Extended Continental Shelf in Somalia v. Kenya in the ICJ: A Critique
Published in
Chinese Journal of International Law, February 2023
DOI 10.1093/chinesejil/jmad001
Authors

Jianjun Gao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#14,288,653
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Journal of International Law
#113
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,874
of 473,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Journal of International Law
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.