↓ Skip to main content

Restoring marsh elevation in a rapidly subsiding salt marsh by thin-layer deposition of dredged material1Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement or…

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Engineering, February 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Restoring marsh elevation in a rapidly subsiding salt marsh by thin-layer deposition of dredged material1Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation for use by the US Government.1
Published in
Ecological Engineering, February 1999
DOI 10.1016/s0925-8574(98)00061-5
Authors

Mark A Ford, Donald R Cahoon, James C Lynch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 140 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 17%
Student > Master 22 15%
Other 14 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 7%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 14 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 60 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 8%
Unspecified 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 20 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Engineering
#502
of 1,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,692
of 102,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Engineering
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,570 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.