↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Essential data dimensions for prospective international data collection in older age bipolar disorder (OABD): Recommendations from the GAGE‐BD group
Published in
Bipolar Disorders, March 2023
DOI 10.1111/bdi.13312
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

By 2030, over 50% of individuals living with bipolar disorder (BD) are expected to be aged ≥ 50 years. However, older age bipolar disorder (OABD) remains understudied. There are limited large-scale prospectively collected data organized in key dimensions capable of addressing several fundamental questions about BD affecting this subgroup of patients. We developed initial recommendations for the essential dimensions for OABD data collection, based on 1) a systematic review of measures used in OABD studies, 2) a Delphi consensus of international OABD experts, 3) experience with harmonizing OABD data in the Global Aging & Geriatric Experiments in Bipolar Disorder Database (GAGE-BD, n≥4,500 participants), and 4) critical feedback from 34 global experts in geriatric mental health. We identified 15 key dimensions and variables within each that are relevant for the investigation of OABD: 1) demographics, 2) core symptoms of depression and 3) mania, 4) cognition screening and subjective cognitive function, 5) elements for BD diagnosis, 6) descriptors of course of illness, 7) treatment, 8) suicidality , 9) current medication , 10) psychiatric comorbidity, 11) psychotic symptoms, 12) general medical comorbidities, 13) functioning , 14) family history, and 15) other. We also recommend particular instruments for capturing some of the dimensions and variables. The essential data dimensions we present should be of use to guide future international data collection in OABD and clinical practice. In the longer-term, we aim to establish a prospective consortium using this core set of dimensions and associated variables to answer research questions relevant to OABD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 11%
Unspecified 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 16 57%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 15 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#16,700,795
of 28,043,368 outputs
Outputs from Bipolar Disorders
#849
of 1,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,200
of 437,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bipolar Disorders
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,043,368 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.