↓ Skip to main content

Influence of various water quality sampling strategies on load estimates for small streams

Overview of attention for article published in Water Resources Research, December 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence of various water quality sampling strategies on load estimates for small streams
Published in
Water Resources Research, December 1999
DOI 10.1029/1999wr900277
Authors

Dale M. Robertson, Eric D. Roerish

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 10%
Ireland 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 50 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 23 38%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 17%
Engineering 8 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2015.
All research outputs
#8,411,853
of 25,130,202 outputs
Outputs from Water Resources Research
#1,993
of 5,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,182
of 110,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Resources Research
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,130,202 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.