You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Human papilomaviru‐related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and radiomics: A new era?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jop.13419 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elisabetta Caprini, Giampaolo D'Agnese, Peter A. Brennan, Siavash Rahimi |
| Abstract |
The increase of the incidence of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) dependent oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is alarming, although we have greatly progressed in the classification and staging of this disease. We now know that OPSCC-HPV+ is a sub-type of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with favourable prognosis and good response to therapy that needs a proper system of classification and staging. Thus, in routine practice it is essential to test patients for the presence of HPV. The most popular technique to assess HPV status is immunohistochemistry on biopsy samples with p16, which is an excellent surrogate for high-risk HPV infection. Another highly sensitive and specific tissue-based technique for the detection of HPV is RNAscope In Situ Hybridization (ISH) that has a prohibitive cost, limiting its use in routine practice. Radiomic is an artificial intelligence based non-invasive method of computational analysis of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, and ultrasound images. A growing body of evidence suggest that radiomics is able to characterise and detect early relapse after treatment, and enable development of tailored therapy of HPV-positive OPSCC. In this review, we summarise the last findings of radiomic applied to HPV-associated OPSCC. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 36% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 4% |
| Philippines | 1 | 4% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,966,777
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine
#16
of 970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,104
of 427,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 970 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.