↓ Skip to main content

Capuchin monkey (Sapajus spp.) diet: current knowledge, gaps, and future directions

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Capuchin monkey (Sapajus spp.) diet: current knowledge, gaps, and future directions
Published in
Primates, February 2023
DOI 10.1007/s10329-023-01057-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alecsander Rasec-Silva, Alessandra Bertassoni, Paulo De Marco Júnior

Abstract

Knowledge of the feeding habits of primate species is important for an understanding of their natural history and ecological interactions between their groups, and their interactions with their environments. Capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) present significant diet flexibility and are a good model for investigating diet diversity between species. We undertook a systematic literature review of publications on the diet of free-living Sapajus spp. groups by using the Web of Science platform. We performed scientometric analyses of the objectives and hypotheses of the reviewed works, identified knowledge gaps, and evaluated the composition of each group's diet. Our results indicate geographic and taxonomic biases among the 59 published studies that we examined. The studies were focused on Sapajus nigritus, Sapajus libidinosus, and Sapajus apella, and undertaken in long-term study sites. Foraging and behavioral aspects of how food is processed were recurring themes. Capuchin monkeys increase their consumption of anthropogenic food according to its supply. Despite the similar objectives of these studies, standardized data collection protocols were not employed. Although Sapajus spp. are widely distributed and are used for cognitive studies, basic aspects of their natural history, such as their diet, remain unknown. We emphasize the importance of undertaking studies on this genus to fill the identified knowledge gaps, and propose that investigations should be carried out on the effects of dietary changes on individuals and groups. We stress that, as the Neotropical region is one of those most affected by anthropogenic impacts, opportunities to study these primates in their natural environments are diminishing daily.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 40%
Unspecified 1 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,802,561
of 25,463,724 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#828
of 1,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,124
of 423,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.