↓ Skip to main content

Choosing Indicators of Natural Resource Condition: A Case Study in Arches National Park, Utah, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, July 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Choosing Indicators of Natural Resource Condition: A Case Study in Arches National Park, Utah, USA
Published in
Environmental Management, July 1998
DOI 10.1007/s002679900135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jayne Belnap

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 10%
Portugal 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 80 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Master 15 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 12%
Other 6 6%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 33 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 7%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 14 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#737
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,344
of 32,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them