↓ Skip to main content

Tinnitus in a Single-Sided Deaf Ear Reduces Speech Reception in the Nontinnitus Ear

Overview of attention for article published in Otology & Neurotology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Tinnitus in a Single-Sided Deaf Ear Reduces Speech Reception in the Nontinnitus Ear
Published in
Otology & Neurotology, June 2013
DOI 10.1097/mao.0b013e31828779f0
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The influence of tinnitus on speech reception is under debate. A few previous studies addressed this issue and compared speech reception in groups with and without tinnitus, with tinnitus arising in both ears or in the same test ear. Recently, we demonstrated that loudness of tinnitus in single-sided deafness (SSD) could be reduced dramatically by implanting and activating a cochlear implant (CI).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Student > Master 13 18%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 39%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Engineering 4 5%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2013.
All research outputs
#8,427,292
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Otology & Neurotology
#823
of 3,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,484
of 206,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Otology & Neurotology
#10
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,960 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.