↓ Skip to main content

Does low-density lipoprotein fully explain atherosclerotic risk in familial hypercholesterolemia?

Overview of attention for article published in Current Opinion in Lipidology, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does low-density lipoprotein fully explain atherosclerotic risk in familial hypercholesterolemia?
Published in
Current Opinion in Lipidology, February 2023
DOI 10.1097/mol.0000000000000868
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shoa L. Clarke

Abstract

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a monogenic disorder of elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from birth leading to increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, not all carriers of FH variants display an FH phenotype. Despite this fact, FH variants confer increased risk for atherosclerotic disease in population cohorts. An important question to consider is whether measurements of LDL-C can fully account for this risk. The atherosclerotic risk associated with FH variants is independent of observed adult LDL-C levels. Modeling adult longitudinal LDL-C accounts for more of this risk compared to using a single measurement. Still, even when adjusting for observed longitudinal LDL-C in adult cohorts, FH variant carriers are at increased risk for coronary artery disease. Genetic analyses, observational studies, and clinical trials all suggest that cumulative LDL-C is a critical driver of cardiovascular risk that may not be fully appreciated by routine LDL-C measurements in adulthood. As such, FH variants confer risk independent of adult LDL-C because these variants increase cumulative LDL-C exposure starting from birth. Both research and clinical practice focus on LDL-C measurements in adults, but measurements during adulthood do not reflect lifelong cumulative exposure to LDL-C. Genetic assessments may compliment clinical assessments by better identifying patients who have experienced greater longitudinal LDL-C exposure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,264,150
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Lipidology
#166
of 1,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,841
of 478,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Lipidology
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.