You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Post‐release survival of shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) and silky (Carcharhinus falciformis) sharks released from pelagic tuna longlines in the Pacific Ocean
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aquatic Conservation, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/aqc.3920 |
| Authors |
Malcolm P. Francis, Warrick S. Lyon, Shelley C. Clarke, Brittany Finucci, Melanie R. Hutchinson, Steven E. Campana, Michael K. Musyl, Kurt M. Schaefer, Simon D. Hoyle, Tom Peatman, Diego Bernal, Keith Bigelow, John Carlson, Rui Coelho, Craig Heberer, David Itano, Emma Jones, Bruno Leroy, Kwang‐Ming Liu, Hilario Murua, François Poisson, Paul Rogers, Caroline Sanchez, Yasuko Semba, Tim Sippel, Neville Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| Canada | 3 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 4% |
| Armenia | 1 | 2% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 2% |
| Gambia | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 60% |
| Scientists | 16 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 39% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,350,453
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Conservation
#123
of 1,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,333
of 423,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Conservation
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.