↓ Skip to main content

訓練データ自動生成によるディープラーニングベースの気泡検出(PEM水電解への応用)

Overview of attention for article published in Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese), March 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
訓練データ自動生成によるディープラーニングベースの気泡検出(PEM水電解への応用)
Published in
Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese), March 2023
DOI 10.1299/transjsme.22-00325
Authors

朝岡 洸太, 和久田 康平, 金本 凌, 諏訪 秀樹, 荒木 拓人

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2023.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese)
#100
of 550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,883
of 422,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese)
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 550 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.