You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Simple method for the measurement of the hydrogenotrophic methanogenic activity of anaerobic sludges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Microbiological Methods, August 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1016/0167-7012(96)00915-3 |
| Authors |
John D. Coates, Michael F. Coughlan, Emer Colleran |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Slovakia | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 154 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 19% |
| Researcher | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 47 | 29% |
| Engineering | 39 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 33 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2015.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Microbiological Methods
#317
of 2,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,700
of 28,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Microbiological Methods
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.