You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anthropogenic Sediment Resuspension Mechanisms in a Shallow Microtidal Estuary
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Estuarine Coastal & Shelf Science, November 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1006/ecss.1996.0086 |
| Authors |
David H. Schoellhamer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 20 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 15% |
| Engineering | 9 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2016.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Estuarine Coastal & Shelf Science
#896
of 3,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,616
of 26,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Estuarine Coastal & Shelf Science
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them