You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Precise characterization of a corridor-shaped structure in Khufu’s Pyramid by observation of cosmic-ray muons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-023-36351-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sébastien Procureur, Kunihiro Morishima, Mitsuaki Kuno, Yuta Manabe, Nobuko Kitagawa, Akira Nishio, Hector Gomez, David Attié, Ami Sakakibara, Kotaro Hikata, Masaki Moto, Irakli Mandjavidze, Patrick Magnier, Marion Lehuraux, Théophile Benoit, Denis Calvet, Xavier Coppolani, Mariam Kebbiri, Philippe Mas, Hany Helal, Mehdi Tayoubi, Benoit Marini, Nicolas Serikoff, Hamada Anwar, Vincent Steiger, Fumihiko Takasaki, Hirofumi Fujii, Kotaro Satoh, Hideyo Kodama, Kohei Hayashi, Pierre Gable, Emmanuel Guerriero, Jean-Baptiste Mouret, Tamer Elnady, Yasser Elshayeb, Mohamed Elkarmoty |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 278 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 38 | 14% |
| Japan | 19 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 5% |
| France | 8 | 3% |
| Spain | 6 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 1% |
| Italy | 3 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 34 | 12% |
| Unknown | 146 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 237 | 85% |
| Scientists | 29 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 21% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 6 | 25% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1452. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,512
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#173
of 58,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251
of 424,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#9
of 1,867 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,867 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.