You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Contribution of Moral Case Deliberation to Teaching RCR to PhD Students
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science and Engineering Ethics, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11948-023-00431-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giulia Inguaggiato, Krishma Labib, Natalie Evans, Fenneke Blom, Lex Bouter, Guy Widdershoven |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Portugal | 1 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
| Poland | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
| Scientists | 8 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,136,653
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#254
of 966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,840
of 423,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.