↓ Skip to main content

Engineering high throughput screening platforms of cervical cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 2,655)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Engineering high throughput screening platforms of cervical cancer
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A, March 2023
DOI 10.1002/jbm.a.37522
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ines A. Cadena, Mina R. Buchanan, Conor G. Harris, Molly A. Jenne, Willie E. Rochefort, Dylan Nelson, Kaitlin C. Fogg

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in women under 40 and is one of the few cancers to have an increased incidence rate and decreased survival rate over the last 10 years. One in five patients will have recurrent and/or distant metastatic disease and these patients face a 5-year survival rate of less than 17%. Thus, there is a pressing need to develop new anticancer therapeutics for this underserved patient population. However, the development of new anticancer drugs remains a challenge, as only 7% of novel anticancer drugs are approved for clinical use. To facilitate identification of novel and effective anticancer drugs for cervical cancer, we developed a multilayer multicellular platform of human cervical cancer cell lines and primary human microvascular endothelial cells that interfaces with high throughput drug screening methods to evaluate the anti-metastatic and anti-angiogenic drug efficacy simultaneously. Through the use of design of experiments statistical optimization, we identified the specific concentrations of collagen I, fibrinogen, fibronectin, GelMA, and PEGDA in each hydrogel layer that maximized both cervical cancer invasion and endothelial microvessel length. We then validated the optimized platform and assessed its viscoelastic properties. Finally, using this optimized platform, we conducted a targeted drug screen of four clinically relevant drugs on two cervical cancer cell lines. Overall, this work provides a valuable platform that can be used to screen large compound libraries for mechanistic studies, drug discovery, and precision oncology for cervical cancer patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Unknown 5 71%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 29%
Unknown 5 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2023.
All research outputs
#503,474
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A
#4
of 2,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,532
of 424,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,655 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.