↓ Skip to main content

The Geology of Gaspra

Overview of attention for article published in ICARUS, January 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Geology of Gaspra
Published in
ICARUS, January 1994
DOI 10.1006/icar.1994.1006
Authors

M.H. Carr, R.L. Kirk, A. McEwen, J. Veverka, P. Thomas, J.W. Head, S. Murchie

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 8%
Puerto Rico 1 4%
Unknown 21 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 38%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 17%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 10 42%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 25%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from ICARUS
#2,514
of 5,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,495
of 71,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ICARUS
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.