↓ Skip to main content

Development of lava tubes in the light of observations at Mauna Ulu, Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Volcanology, November 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of lava tubes in the light of observations at Mauna Ulu, Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii
Published in
Bulletin of Volcanology, November 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf00326461
Authors

Donald W. Peterson, Robin T. Holcomb, Robert I. Tilling, Robert L. Christiansen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Master 7 11%
Professor 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 42 66%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,220,755
of 24,630,122 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#416
of 1,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,047
of 23,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,630,122 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.