↓ Skip to main content

Validation of an Abridged Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model for the General Population

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Prevention Research, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of an Abridged Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model for the General Population
Published in
Cancer Prevention Research, March 2023
DOI 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-22-0460
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erika L. Spaeth, Gillian S. Dite, John L. Hopper, Richard Allman

Abstract

Accurate breast cancer risk prediction could improve risk-reduction paradigms if thoughtfully employed in clinical practice. Identification of at-risk women is the first step in tailoring risk screening and risk-reduction protocols to women's needs. Using the UK Biobank, we validated a simple risk model to predict breast cancer risk in the general population. Our simple breast cancer risk (BRISK) model integrates a combination of impactful breast cancer-associated risk factors including extended family history and polygenic risk allowing for the removal of moderate factors currently found in comprehensive traditional models. Using two versions of BRISK, differing by 77-SNP versus 313-SNP polygenic risk score integration, we found improved discrimination and risk categorization of both BRISK models compared to one of the most well-known models, the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BRCAT). Over a five-year period, at-risk women classified ≥3% 5-year risk by BRISK had a 1.829 (95% CI = 1.710, 1.956) times increased incidence of breast cancer compared to the population, which was higher than the 1.413 (95% CI = 1.217 to 1.640) times increased incidence for women classified ≥3% by BCRAT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Computer Science 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2023.
All research outputs
#615,629
of 23,750,517 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Prevention Research
#79
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,159
of 417,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Prevention Research
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,750,517 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.